خلاف النحويين في أولى العاملين بالعمل في التنازع : دراسة دلالية

Abstract EN

Both Kufaian and Basrians scholars disagreed as to which of the two factors is the first to work in “the Ma’amoul”.

for example, if two factors are directed to one “Ma’amoul” such as “I met and honored Mohammad”.

here, both verbs are directed to one entity which is Mohammad in terms of meaning, by being a subject of the first and an object of the second.

as for the pronunciation, it is not permissible for them to work because it will not become nominative and subjective at the same time.

however, scholars agreed-except Farah, linguist,-on the permissibility of implementing the first or the second, but they differed in priority.

so, the Basrians were of the view that the implementation of the second is better based on listening and considering the aspect of distance.

the Kufians held that the priority is for the first in action because of the power of initiation whereas the second should be hidden and mentioning it is not permissible.