محاكمة كتاب رجم الزاني جريمة يهودية لمسلمات البحث العلمي

Abstract EN

The author of the book decided: (stoning the adulterer is a Jewish crime and slander against Islam) that stoning the adulterer is a Jewish crime, and is purely a slander against Islam, and this result decided by the result of contrary to what follows on the belief of Muslims, and what was agreed upon by the jurists of Islam by the testimony of the writer himself.

and to judge to the postulates of scientific research, in order to stand on solid ground on which we can build a debate governed by reason and logic, through which it is clear how close or remote the approach taken by the writer from the foundations, rules and postulates decided by experts in the methods of scientific research.

approach: in this research, I followed the integrative (analytical- critical) approach.

results: the writer's lack of objectivity in discussing scientific issues, his selectivity in citing the words of scholars, and in choosing sources and references, neglects the evidence against the statement he wants to prove, which makes the reader doubt his credibility and impartiality in dealing with science issues, that the doubt in which the writer fell is a flawed paranoid doubt in scientific research, other than systematic doubt, in addition to arbitrariness in the interpretation of texts.

recommendations: one of the tasks in the defense of the Sunnah is to clarify the flaws and methodological errors of the appellants and to clarify their violation of the postulates and sects of scientific research.