جدلية القطع و الظن بأدلة أصول الفقه بين الشاطبي و ابن عاشور
Other Title(s)
The dialectic of deduction and suspicion of the evidence of the principles of jurisprudence between al-Shatibi and Ibn Ashour
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 12, Issue 9 (31 Dec. 2021), pp.163-185, 23 p.
Publisher
Tikrit University College of Islamic Sciences
Publication Date
2021-12-31
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
23
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
This research deals with the issue of (characterizing the principles of jurisprudence in terms of definitive and presumptive) between two great scholars of the Al-Maqasediya School; Imam Al-Shatibi and Sheikh Al-Taher bin Ashour, may Allah Almighty have mercy on them, through their two books Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul Al-Shari'a, and the Intentions of Islamic Shari'a.
The researcher tried to root the issue in the view of the fundamentalists, then presented the opinions of the two Scholars, supported by evidences for each of them from their aforementioned sources, and then discussed each of the two sayings with what appeared to me based on analysis first, and on the sources approved in the principles of jurisprudence, then arriving at the most correct opinion of not stipulating Peremptory issues of jurisprudence and its evidences.
American Psychological Association (APA)
مثنى عارف داود. 2021. جدلية القطع و الظن بأدلة أصول الفقه بين الشاطبي و ابن عاشور. مجلة العلوم الإسلامية،مج. 12، ع. 9، ص ص. 163-185.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1359395
Modern Language Association (MLA)
مثنى عارف داود. جدلية القطع و الظن بأدلة أصول الفقه بين الشاطبي و ابن عاشور. مجلة العلوم الإسلامية مج. 12، ع. 9 (2021)، ص ص. 163-185.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1359395
American Medical Association (AMA)
مثنى عارف داود. جدلية القطع و الظن بأدلة أصول الفقه بين الشاطبي و ابن عاشور. مجلة العلوم الإسلامية. 2021. مج. 12، ع. 9، ص ص. 163-185.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1359395
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
-
Record ID
BIM-1359395