رقابة المحكمة الدستورية على القوانين الأساسية : دراسة تحليلية وصفية مقارنة بين دولة فلسطين و مصر

Abstract EN

The principle of oversight of basic laws is considered one of the most important principles that must be paid attention to in order to bring about compatibility between each of the provisions of the constitution and basic laws to reach the principle of constitutional legality.

Therefore, the study raised a major problem represented in the extent of the constitutional court’s authority to monitor basic laws.

In answer to this question, the descriptive-analytical approach was based, and the study concluded a set of results, the most important of which are: The difference in the legal value of laws and basic regulations from a flexible constitution to a rigid constitution.

It has a higher value than ordinary legislation in countries with rigid constitutions because it has surrounded them with special procedures as they relate to issues of a constitutional nature.

The Study has also concluded a set of recommendations, the most prominent of which are: providing laws and basic regulations with more guarantees and procedures because they are related to issues of a constitutional nature that would affect the political reality in the state, and to follow the approach of the Egyptian constitutional legislator 1971, in accordance with Article (195) thereof.