ملامح التفكير النحوي في وصف (مسألة الكحل)‎ و تأويلها بين الحاجة و الترف الفكري

Abstract EN

The "Kohl" question is an example of an obstacle in the implementation of factor theory in a syntactic lesson.

this is because it is a deviation of the scope of the rule of superlatives, despite citing hearsay evidence representing them.

this is why syntacticians devoted their attention when dealing with them.

the study represents their efforts when solving the issue and ultimately attempts to answer the question : were their way of thinking coming out of necessity or was it because they had no limits in their imagination in a way that their actions actually constituted an intellectual luxury? i followed an analytical descriptive methodology and concluded that syntacticians’ deep awareness to the relationship between vocabulary of composition and their achievement to the meaning of the general context.

this was evidently witnessed in their description of the problem, their attempts to control it, their interpretation, and the bases on which it is built.

their way of thinking appeared in two forms: theoretical aspects concerned with their activation of the idea of analogy and general principles, and the methodological aspects of their attempts to solve the linguistic material on hand which was represented in comparison and assumption.

the syntacticians therefore were forced to come up with a solution to a necessity stemming from that exit and its interpretation.