حكم سرقة الحديث و أنواعه و تمييزه عن المقلوب والموضوع مع التعليل و الأمثلة

Abstract EN

The most important feature of this researchis that it discusses one of the neglected hadithterms in the books of the term despite the useof the imams of the wound and not modifyingit in criticizing some of the narrators accusedof it, and clarifying the words indicating it, andthe legal and legal rulings for theft of hadith byanalogy with the provisions of intellectual theftin the present era.

The ruling on the stolen narrationand its distinction from the narration preservedfor it, and the ruling on the narrator'sstories accused of theft, in addition to the distinctionbetween other reformers between themand theft in general and in particular, and theyare the two terms «heart of the hadith” and itsstatus, taking into account the number of somescholars of fraud from the types of theft, especiallythe fraud of kindness, silence and settlement, and this included this Research the typesof theft and the most important causes and purposesand we concluded the research with whatIbn Hibban separated and in the wounded in thejudgment of the narrator accused of theft and thejudgment of his narratives and invoking them.

Inthe last section, we included samples of the typesof theft as mentioned by Ibn Uday in Al-Kamillost the weak, arranging these examples on thepictures of the types of theft so that the readercan understand how the hadith is stolen and themethods of the narrators accused of these thefts, and in the end we mentioned in the conclusion ofthe research the most important results extractedfrom it.

God knows.