مفهوم اللغة و مستوياتها و تطبيقاتها في علوم القرآن بين التراث و المعاصرة

Abstract EN

Our research is an attempt to approach the linguistic approach in the concept of language and its characteristics between the ancients and the modernists.

a judgmental study ; and a statement of the linguistic thought of the ancients, on which the modernists relied on establishing a linguistic curriculum that allows them to adopt a new approach in which they disagreed with the ancients, with a more accurate presentation of the opinions of the modernists especially in the phonemic and morphological dimensions ; as a result of the use of laboratory tools by modernists in phonemic analysis (syllabus), and then the emergence of accurate phonemic results that cast a shadow over the morphological dimension (structure) in the study of language among the hadiths ; they note the structural approach adopted by them between the four linguistic dimensions.

(phoneme, morphology, grammar, and connotation) ; this is the approach adopted by most of the modern scholars in an attempt to limit the meaning.

establishing a linguistic theory in which they distinguished themselves from the ancients ; it is no secret to the insider the value of what was produced by the pens of orientalists and western linguists in general.

the likes of de Saussure, the pioneer of the prophetic school, firth, the pioneer of the contextual school, and Chomsky, the pioneer of the transformative school, from theories whose authors wanted to define the linguistic meaning with more precision.

in addition to their attempt to limit the linguistic characteristics of all languages.

this is what lured modern Arab researchers in applying these theories to the Arabic language.

in an attempt to highlight the value of the Arabic language and its alignment with western approaches to research ; this has resulted in the emergence of different positions among modern Arab linguists.

some of them were objective in their results depending on the criterion of the specificity of the Arabic language.

he reconciled between the universality of theory among western linguists, and the specificity of the Arabic language.

the results of his linguistic research were bright and fair.

like Dr.

Tammam Hassan, Dr.

Khalil Amayreh ...

and others accused the Arabic language, according to the Arab linguists, of deficiencies in their linguistic research.

and they forcibly twist the necks of the Arabic language to international linguistic theories.

forgetting its privacy, tracing western linguists to the point of astonishment ; it set aside the objective and fair results of their research.