تحرير محل النزاع في البحث العلمي الشرعي: مفهومه، ضرورته وأثره

Abstract EN

Each of the two differences can refer to a common denominator between their opinions, which may end up with mental axioms, and then each one of them uses what distinguishes his opinion, to refer to this competence as the “subject of dispute”, which is the most important phase of research on controversies, through an advanced process known as “the liberation of the subject of dispute”, in this research, I was exposed to this process by defining a deconstruction of the additive compound vocabulary expressed and then by defining its concept.

then I explained that the aim of this operation is to limit the image of the dispute specifically in order to contain evidence, so that pilgrims do not get distracted from the meritorious aspects, and I also cited different models of the scientists' work in liberating it.

in order to demonstrate the need for attention to this process in controversial research, I was exposed to a statement of the critical importance of the liberation of the conflict in the stages of scientific research, which made it an imperative for research; in order to protect the researcher's time, he spends without any significant return of knowledge, and to protect the intellectual human act from tampering.

then, I concluded with detailing the objective and industrial effects of liberating the cause of conflict in terms of legitimate research and the art of controversy.

these effects, which the researcher and interlocutor will only realize by standing for a long time, will liberate the heart of disagreement and bring closer his distance.