موجب القضاء في العبادات ونماذج من تطبيقاته

Abstract EN

This research talks about the judiciary, is it obligatory with something new? Or the first thing? So, the one who is commanded to do something on a particular day, should he take anything otherthan that day or not? Whoever necessitates the judiciary with the first order, the penalty for complianceis made conditional on not knowing or suspecting corruption.

More than what the judiciaryrequires.

An act is not called a qada unless there is a reason for the obligation of performance even thoughthere is no performance.

Hence some of them have illusion that the delegate is not called a qada'and that the jurists' view of paying salaries is a metaphor, which is required by the words of themajority and the terminology that there is no difference between them.

It will be evident through the research that there is no difference between the duty and the delegatein the judiciary (according to the opinion of those who said that it is obligatory to performin the delegated case in the case of Sharia) some have been illusion that the delegate is not called ajudge and that the saying of the jurists about the payment of salaries is permissible, so it should besaid and found in him the reason for the matter.

One of the branches of our research is that the taxpayer who was engaged in prayer and it wasarranged in his responsibility, so it became a debt on him, and the debt does not fall except by payingit, and if he is late for his specified time, a sinner for taking the prayer beyond its time and withproven sin, he must repent to God Almighty and from repentance his initiative to judge.

Likewise, whoever vowed to do a specific act of worship and was able to perform it, and therewas no legal impediment, he must fulfill what he committed to.

that.