العلاقة بين سلطات النظام السياسي في تشيلي

Abstract EN

Democratic representation appears to be under increasing pressure in many well-established democracies, such as Greece and Spain.

Chile also follows this trend, but there are some differences that make the Chilean case distinctive, and Chile is broadly one of the most cohesive democracies in Latin America with an economic performance Strong, however, citizens have demonstrated decreasing levels of satisfaction with democracy and representative institutions, and turn to protest and social mobilization to express their discontent.

The paradox that Chile faces today is the mismatch between the attitudes of voters and the overall performance of the system.

In explaining this intriguing conundrum, Most of the policy studies emphasized the legacy of institutions inherited from military rule, and despite the existence of institutions, they are not suited to the challenges facing the political system.

Chile became independent from Spanish colonial rule since 1818 and has witnessed many changes in government since then, and the first rule By the Supreme Director, the country plunged into political turmoil in 1823, and conservatives controlled the country from 1830 to 1861, establishing An authoritarian republican government created the Chilean Constitution of 1833.

Ultimately, the liberals rebelled and took control from 1861 to 1891, continuing to rule under the 1833 constitution, and from 1891 to 1925 the constitution was amended to give the president more power.

In response to a failing economy, the coup The successful military in 1973 brought Chile into a military regime until 1990, when the citizens voted not to allow the military leader to carry out another term, a new president and Congress were elected, and the country transitioned to a representative democratic republic.