Reviewing legal changes regarding testimony

Abstract EN

One of the most important necessities of human social life is the law.

the law is one of the most objective and first criteria in judging civilizations and reflects the wise thinking of the people and their leaders and shows the principles on which they have based their standards of life.

what gives special importance to legal systems and legislative institutions is, firstly, the regularity of that system and the basis of laws on general principles and foundations, and secondly, its flexibility, so that it can play a role against possible changes in social change in human life.

in the evolution of laws, considering the dignity of Islamic jurisprudence, independence, self-confidence, honor and dignity, we should test the issues with the divine religion and find a way out of the problems from the text of the religion and find a jurisprudential solution.

the purpose of changing the law can be considered in being privileged, being able to compete with the future and looking at providing and protecting the rights of individuals.

conflict of laws with jurisprudential rules and general rules based on the positive principles of tradition, consensus and reason, as well as ambiguity in laws, can be the reasons for the evolution of laws.

in Islamic jurisprudence, what causes the validity of testimony is in fact subject to the existential and negative conditions of the witness ; in other words, the conditions of the witness are so difficult that it is necessary to accept less testimony in practice.

but if a testimony is obtained with all its conditions, it can be a definitive document of the sentence.

in the evolution of the laws on testimony, it can be said that the legislator has moved from a situation in which the value of testimony was drastically reduced to a situation in which the validity of testimony has been restored and a position similar to that in jurisprudence.

it is a testimony.