الفصل بين المعمول و عامله في أي الذكر الحكيم

Abstract EN

This research represented the interruption of the affected from its factor, that interruption has taken multiple manifestations; As it may be the result of the separation between the affected and its factor with end of verses, and it may be the result of the mediation of the Parenthesis sentence between the affected and its factor or result from the endowment on the affected without its factor, and the interruption may be good acceptable or unacceptable.

The study was divided into three sections, the first of which dealt with the interruption of the affected from its factor with the end of verses.

The second topic dealt with the interruption of the affected from its factor in the Parenthesis sentence; so that it comes as a separator between the affected and his grammatical agent, as for the third topic, it deals with the interruption of the affected from his grammatical agent by the endowment.

Among the most important findings of the research: the differences in the forms of interruption, good and bad; All forms of interruption in the Parenthesis sentence are acceptable manifestations of discontinuity; because it’s in the rule of communication, rather it makes the meaning clearer and more stable, and interruption by stopping may be acceptable or unacceptable, and interruption by the Qur’anic comma is often acceptable.

The research recommended studying the phenomenon of interruption of the factor in the Holy Qur’an, tracking all its manifestations and counting them, and then showing the effect of that interruption.