حكم النبوة بين الفرق في التاريخ الإسلامي (الأشاعرة و المعتزلة و الفلاسفة)‎ أنموذجا : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة نقدية

Abstract EN

Prophethood and the mission are among the doctrinal issues around which there has been much talk among the sects in Islamic history from various sides.

As for their ruling - which is the subject of research - some Islamic sects went to the ruling that it is obligatory, such as the Mu'tazila and those who agreed with them This is based on their saying that God Almighty must be righteous and fittest, and the whole mission is goodness and goodness, as it is obligatory, and the philosophers went to rule that it is affirmative based on their doctrine based on causes and natures, The Ash'ari and those who agreed with them went on to say that it is possible and permissible, so existence and nothingness are equal in it, and its existence or lack thereof is not necessary, and that is based on their origin saying that it is not obligatory for God Almighty.

He disagreed with it, and through this research I will stand on the reality of these differences in the ruling of prophethood, in order to try to show the truth and destroy the falsehood of these ideas with evidence and proof, and before going into discussion of opinions and statement of sayings, I will know the Prophet and the Messenger in terms of language and idiom and the difference between them.