نظرات نقدية في مسألة ظنية أصول تصحيح الروايات

Abstract EN

Research Topic : Study on the issue of presumptive nature of principles of authenticating narrations.

Main Objective of the Study : Critiquing the view that the principles of authenticating narrations are totally presumptive hence some people are using this view to reject ahadith that are agreed upon by scholars of hadith as authentic, in a way that is not consistent with scientific methodology.

Research Problem : What exactly are these principles? What is their position in terms of certainty and presumption? How do we regulate the view that their results are presumptive? What is the origin of the difference resulting from the principles of authentication? Who are the first proponents of the view that they are totally presumptive? What led to this view? What are the probable arguments in its favour and the response to them? Research Findings: 1-That the principles of authenticating narrations are certain in their conditions, and at the same time we are confident in the rulings derived from them.

As for the view that these principles are presumptive in their conditionality, or that the results from them are presumptive, this is an innovation.

2-That the rulings derived from principles of authentication are matters of scholarly efforts.

However, that should not cast doubt on every ruling derived from them claiming that it is presumptive and based on scholarly effort.

3-The first person to come up with the view that the principles of authenticating narrations are presumptive is Sheikh Dhafar Ahmad al-Uthmani at-Tah-anawi (Died 1394 AH), and what led him to this is his attempt to defend the Hanafi school of thought and refute its oppositions.