![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
الخبرة في نظام الإثبات في المملكة العربية السعودية : دراسة تأصيلية مقارنة بما عليه العمل في نظام المرافعات الشرعية
Other Title(s)
Experience in the legal evidence law in Ksa : a detailed comparative study of what is to be done in the legal pleading law
Author
Source
مجلة الأندلس للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية
Issue
Vol. 9, Issue 57 (30 Jun. 2022), pp.6-43, 38 p.
Publisher
Alandalus University for Science and Technology
Publication Date
2022-06-30
Country of Publication
Yemen
No. of Pages
38
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
The justice law in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is witnessing development in all legislative and procedural fields.
This is confirmed by the issuance of the legal evidence Law, which was included in the legal pleadings Law and the commercial court law.
It is independent of a new law that shows differences that demonstrates the Saudi regulator- keeping pace with the developments of the time while preserving the spirit of Sharia, and this research is the core in showing some of the advantages of the new legal evidence law.
Experience is one of the means used in the legal evidence law, and its distinction in the new law has been shown by many differences that this research demonstrates.
It aims to show the Saudi judicial development and to show the differences in experience between the law of legal pleadings and the law of evidence, in which the comparative analytical inductive approach was taken.
It concluded with several results, including: the emergence of the judicial development in Saudi laws and keeping pace with the development in many cases, and reached many differences in experience between the pleadings and evidence law, including that if the opponent does not deposit the amount determined for expertise, the court decides to stop the case, or forfeit his right to The decision to delegate, as well as setting a period of five days for warning the expert after it was only three days, Likewise, if the court does not take into account the expert’s report due to his negligence or error, it orders the return of all or some of what he received, as the case may be, and sets the deadline for returning papers from the expert to ten days.
It decides to request the expert’s opinion in writing, and the court determines the date of the session and the method for presenting the opinion, and if the court decides to seek the expert’s opinion in a similar case, it has the right to do so.
It was recommended to carry out a number of research projects and fundamental studies of the Evidence Law, assign a number of specialists to show the bright side of these laws, and for universities to adopt draft laws that were not issued.
American Psychological Association (APA)
الحربي، يحيى بن حسين بن يحيى. 2022. الخبرة في نظام الإثبات في المملكة العربية السعودية : دراسة تأصيلية مقارنة بما عليه العمل في نظام المرافعات الشرعية. مجلة الأندلس للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية،مج. 9، ع. 57، ص ص. 6-43.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1439192
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الحربي، يحيى بن حسين بن يحيى. الخبرة في نظام الإثبات في المملكة العربية السعودية : دراسة تأصيلية مقارنة بما عليه العمل في نظام المرافعات الشرعية. مجلة الأندلس للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية مج. 9، ع. 57 (حزيران 2022)، ص ص. 6-43.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1439192
American Medical Association (AMA)
الحربي، يحيى بن حسين بن يحيى. الخبرة في نظام الإثبات في المملكة العربية السعودية : دراسة تأصيلية مقارنة بما عليه العمل في نظام المرافعات الشرعية. مجلة الأندلس للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية. 2022. مج. 9، ع. 57، ص ص. 6-43.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1439192
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-1439192