مفاهيم نقدية عن بنيات الشعر

Abstract EN

The issue of articulation and meaning is an old issue in human thought.

The Greeks took care of it and treated it before it moved to the Ar, and they all touched on the aesthetic criteria that control judging literary work from a technical point of view.

He pointed to the integrity of the general idea in Arabic literature in Arabic literature, whether it was a play, rhetoric, or epic, and at the same time did not neglect to highlight the link between words and meanings in the literary work, and concluded that the beauty of style lies in the good system of the sentence and the parallelism of its parts and the availability of rhyme sometimes between these parts.

Aristotle also points out that judging the parts of a literary work is an integral part of the general view of its general intention.

And Aristotle did not dwell on the words and did not go into depth in studying them because, according to his opinion, they are one of the many artistic resources, some of which relate to the nature of art as it is art or the nature of the literary genre or the organization of its parts and considered them as signs of meanings and symbols, and for this reason he did not stop at meanings, and did not meet them.

With words and on this basis, in their study of the issue of word and meaning, the Arab critics followed Aristotle's approach and gave it great care, and it became one of the most important issues in ancient Arab criticism.