إثبات الخطأ في المسؤولية التقصيرية للإدارة العامة

Abstract EN

Many factors have emerged that control the formation of the theory of proof in administrative law, since the individual claimant, although required to prove what he claims, does not fall outside the rules of justice.

However, given the unequal position between the two opponents, assistance is needed by regulating the burden of proof between the parties through the positive role of the administrative judge, and administrative justice has relied on known means of proof is based on the means of proof known in private law, but its applications point to a different course in that it is dependent on each other without modifying them to bring them into line with the specificity of the law and administrative justice, while other means have been applied with some contempt, given their adverse impact on the relationship between administrative justice and public administration, while others have been excluded from applying them for violations of the system.