Effect of strobe visual training by (vima rev)‎ on dyolo tchagui performance in taekwondoists aged 13-14 years

Abstract EN

This is an experimental study because it allows us to address the problem of our subject and achieve precise results.

the vima rev glasses (the tool of our research) included different stimulations to disrupt vision, the use of this tool was related to various and related to the objectives of each session and the proposed program.

06 taekwondoists (age : 13.66 ± 0.51) (height : 1.60 ± 0.09) (weight : 42.66 ± 8.09) (experience : 1.66 ± 1.21) were evaluated during the end of August early September more precisely from August 24 to September 03.

the sample was evaluated according to the 05 protocols related to two physical qualities is two visual skills : (the reaction speed of the dollyo chagui technical gesture, eyefoot coordination, lateral coordination right foot and left foot, visual field, right and left dominant eye) the visual strobe program included 10 sessions, each session had a specific purpose, and each goal was an essential element to develop the technical gesture studied.

the reaction rate test was well signifying between the first test and the last test, p < (0.01) or 1%, and that there is a significant difference between the two tests and the difference was in favor of the second test.

the eye-foot coordination test was well meaning P < (0.01) or 1%, and that there is a significant difference between the two tests the difference in favor of the second test.

in the last physical quality test of lateral coordination eye-foot (right foot) and (left foot) were in turn significant : -right foot : P < (0.01) or 1%, it is said that the test is significant and that there is a significant difference between the two tests the difference in favor of the second test.

-left foot : P < (0.01) or 1%, it is said that the test is significant and that there is a significant difference between the two tests the difference in favor of the second test.-left foot : P < (0.01) or 1%, it is said that the test is significant and that there is a significant difference between the two tests the difference in favor of the second test.