التفسير القضائي للقانون: حقيقته ومجالاته

Abstract EN

Judicial interpretation is one of the important topics addressed by scholars of jurisprudence and law.

judicial interpretation means that the judge interprets ambiguous, incomplete, or contradictory texts if there is no legislative interpretation.

it is permissible for individuals to ask judges to interpret a legal text that raises doubts about its true meaning.

in his interpretation of legal texts, the judge is not subject to any party or authority, as he is independent in his job and can seek help from the opinions of jurists and their research.

judicial interpretation does not have an obligatory force, as it is binding on the parties to the dispute in respect of whom the interpretation was issued only, and it is not binding on other courts.

what the judiciary settled on in terms of a specific interpretation is not considered binding, and it is possible to abandon it and adopt another interpretation in a similar case, and because it gives more clarity to the parameters of the elicitation of rulings.

therefore, studying this topic and updating it is a necessary necessity for anyone interested in jurisprudence and its principles.