عدالة النقد عند المحدثين

Abstract EN

Ages ago, the process of acceptance of Hadith narration or rejecting had been subjected to tremendous efforts, careful and accurate studies, and reached pure and refined results, accompanied by a precise approach based on honesty, justice and fairness.

This study aimed to highlight and demonstrate the commitment of Imams of Hadith criticism and Hadith scholars.

It is to apply the principle of justice in judging men and accept their nan•ations or reject them, through the methodology of tracking and extrapolation, and the analytical approach to indicate the significance, and highlight the u-ue image that our Imams and scientists took, in applymg the principle of justice in the science of the criticism of men for Hadith Imams.

That is after stopovers on the status of justice in words and testifying in Islam, and how scientists excluded criticism of the narrators of the prohibited backbiting with clear and specific process controls, which the researcher concluded in a number of highlights : Accompanying justice and fairness to the processes of criticism and amendment, And how the Imams of criticism and Hadith scholars were keen to set rules and starting points in criticizing and judging men, and the greatness of their commitment to apply them.

There is no place for compliments and emotions in the methodology of critical imams and Hadith scholars.

The researcher has also recommended: extraction of Methodological treasures accompanied the process of criticism, and amendment by Muslim scholars and Imams of religion, and show the accuracy of the method and the power of perception among Muslim scholars in examining the Sunnah and its nan-ations, to reslÅ)11d to all suspicions of 01ientalists and the like.