المقاربة ما بعد الحداثية للنص القرآني وأثرها على تلقيه بوصفه "خطابا أسطوريا"

Abstract EN

Arkoun builds his hypotheses concerning the koranic text, on concepts from which he benefited from western theories, disdainful of everything related to religions, and which question the "absolute truth" that official and religious organizations claim to possess, because these theories, therefore, attribute to what they call "rational monism," which they believe should be tackled, since it opposes free scientific thought.

this tendency appears in a number of paradoxical and controversial conclusions of the thinker, and we will focus in this article on two questions: the first: the concept of "official corpus" was removed from what was known as "al Mushaf", and the consequences of this marking were that this text in our hands is not the original text, because the original text is rather an oral discourse which ceased to exist with the disappearance of those who made it.

besides the fact that the first copies of the koranic texts have been eliminated, this does not allow us to examine the text and identify its pragmatic aspects, and what has been preserved only reflects the will of the politico-religious authority.

-the second: use the term "myth" in contradiction with the koranic concept, even if the thinker gives it a magical imaginary nature as a kind of justification for this use, and anyone who reads this opinion-in particular non-Muslims, thinks that the Koran is only a beautiful poetic speech.

this, in addition to such a lexical choice, reminds us of the close relationship that connects myth to illusion - that is, that which is outside the truth-or outside the line, as noted in certain linguistic definitions of lexeme ("star": in English "line").