أنتروبولوجيا العقلنة : مقتضيات المفهوم و إشكالاته

Abstract EN

It has become imperative for us to review rationalization, especially in light of the conflicts and quarrels currently taking place in our world, and the division of the world into deep-seated societies, and others riddled with wars, poverty and fear, as neither scientific knowledge, technological power, economic hegemony or weapons of destruction are what determines rationalization Rather, its basis and essence is the extent of its capacity and its mobilizing and moral effect that it has missed, by providing societies with a balanced view of the world while guiding people's behavior, whether politically, socially or culturally.

Is not this situation a reason for reviewing the criteria of rationalization, as it should not be satisfied with logic or testing, but rather the extent of its conformity with the cognitive and social systems to which it belongs, which facilitates understanding the logic and rationality of other cultures? And does epistemological relativism mean a serious questioning of rational values, or is it a call for intercultural equality?