الخلاف الفقهي والقواعد المؤثرة في تضييقه

Abstract EN

This research is about jurisprudential divergence and the most important rules that contribute in reducing and narrowing it, proving the will of the great lord and Muslim scholars to achieve consensus and preserve fraternity and unity among Muslims, and that legitimacy of divergence and describing it as a mercy does not contradicts the necessity to ensure convergence and avoid sources of differences as much as possible.

the study has come to a number of results, most notably: it is incorrect to describe divergence absolutely as bad without any constraints, it is recommended for researchers to study the scientists' texts about the subject according to their contexts, a Muslim researcher cannot deny divergences that occurred among Sahabis and during the prophet's (PBUH) life.

a number of rules in the Islamic heritage-deducted and derived by scientists from texts and rulings-reflect the necessity to ensure convergence and to avoid and reduce divergence as much as possible.

one of the most important purposes of reducing divergence, even when it seems pleasant, is considering the outcomes and blocking the means to division and dissension, as many agreeable divergences have turned out to reprehensible due to ignorance, arrogance and fanaticism.