The role of the art world in enhancing the philosophical perspective of others

Abstract EN

This paper begins with an important question, which is not new: what should be included in the art circle or considered as art, and what should be left outside this circle? to answer this question, i focus first on various definitions of art given by certain theorists, such as hume (1757), bell (1913), weitz (1956), and dickie (2006).

i compare these theorists’ arguments about the definition of art.

through their theories, i discuss the evaluation of artworks depending on whether the judgment is subjective, relating to its evaluation within the art world, or objective, relating to the artwork itself.

then i highlight the notion of criticism and the differences between subjective criticism and objective criticism.

finally, i emphasize the important role of critics in understanding the philosophical perspective, appreciating artwork, and enhancing the academic performance for others.

in this paper, i argue that the evaluation of artwork should depend on subjective judgment-that of the art world-more than objective judgment-focusing on the artistic values of the art object-and that requires the critic to evaluate the artwork objectively.