الجدل النحوي : النشأة و التطور-دراسة تأصيلية

Abstract EN

It is remarkable for the ancients that the term dialectic did not have limit in their works.

Because of the many arguments that took place between grammarians in their debates, dialogues, and disagreements, they lacked the definition of the grammatical debate, and perhaps they may have replaced it by defining dialectic as the science of speech and logic.

Not until when Abu al-Barakat al-Anbari (d.

577 AH) came who laid down his principles and laws in his letter (Al-Ighrib fi fi-Dijal al-Arabiya), meaning ‘Strangeness in the polemics of parsing’ to be the first to classify this industry in the laws of controversy and morals.

These laws are to be when arguing and debating the through path of truth and righteousness.

Also, to be polite upon dialogue, controversies, and quarreling in discourse.

Later, it has been developed to be an approach in the study of controversial issues based on discussion and dialogue, conducted by a grammarian with a real or supposed opponent, grammatical or non-grammatical (linguistic or nonlinguistic), whose aim is to defend his thesis and convince the opponent.

Each of them presents his point of view on the issue, reviewing his evidence on which he relies, and the objections he sees to the evidence of his opponent, and responding to the objections that the justified makes to his evidence.

The grammatical controversy appears in three forms: the first is that it is purely scientific.

The second is that in which science is mixed with nervousness.

As for the third, it is based mainly on conflict and strife.Keywords: debate, arguments, grammatical disagreement, grammatical views.