قصدية الخطاب القرآني في مجادلات طوائف المعاندين : مقاربة بلاغية تداولية

Abstract EN

Cognitive theories have many things in common regarding the analysis of the text, despite their different tendencies.

This is due to the unity of human thought, the similarity of its interests and components, and the accumulation of human knowledge.

The pragmatic, textual, intentional, argumentative and rhetoric theories are all human products with points of agreement and convergence.

The research is concerned with revealing the points of convergence without going into the points of disagreement in order to read the purposes of the stubborn sects, which also agreed despite their different places, times and messengers.

Their denial of the messengers revealed a striking repetition of the places of denial and argument; what was said about the first nations was said about the later ones; Perhaps this reveals the unity of the humans in receiving messages The study reveals the intellectual relations between convergent rhetorical theories, and then introduces the stubborn sects and their different discourses, and then studies the argumentative methods that they used in rejecting the messages of the prophets, showing the characteristics of their polemic rhetorical methods, and also the employment of forms and devices in their discourse, and by analyzing their conversations with the prophets and their conversations among themselves with the eschatological transformation, revealed their commitment to maneuver and quarrels as a method not using evidence or proof.