التزامن و نبذ التاريخ بين الأنثروبولوجيا و علم الاجتماع و اللسانيات

Abstract EN

Count shapes and furniture, bits of each other, bits of each other, look good in different variations.

combined according to the model of the third stage of the third stage to establish an integrated set of education programs.

the tendency to timelessness can be seen with the early anthropologists who devoted their concern to the study of systems in primitive societies that do not care about writing in order to record their traces and synthesize their past, and from here this idea was circulated, and the trend towards patterns became far from history as an epistemological doctrine adopted by constructivist people and constructivist linguistics in their discourse, the perceptions of the positivist school in sociology, anthropology and linguistics coincided with the perceptions of the early anthropologists, as the tendency to reject history after them was adopted and was adopted in retrospective studies when they wanted to stand at the roots of social phenomena.

hence, it was common to look at society, culture, and all human phenomena, from a "non historical" perspective.

thus, the anti-history perspective was reflected on Durkheim and his disciples' positive social discourse, and on the linguistic discourse and its secretions in the world of literature, criticism and culture, so he ended up believing in the independence of language - like any phenomenon - from its history, and from it the independence of literature in all its forms from its history, and this is what it can be sought in Saussure and his successors in the fields of language, literature and criticism, and then in the structural anthropological discourse, as it appears in the clearest form in claude lévi-strauss.