Yield and economic analysis of maize production using various combined tillage machines and comparison to the conventional tillage systems

Joint Authors

Nasir, Aqil J.
Muhsin, Sadiq Jabbar
Ndawi, Dakhil Radi

Source

Journal of Thi-Qar University for Agricultural Researches

Issue

Vol. 11, Issue 2 (31 Dec. 2022), pp.269-284, 16 p.

Publisher

University of Thi-Qar College of Agricultural and Marshes

Publication Date

2022-12-31

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

16

Main Subjects

Agriculture

Abstract EN

This research study was carried out at the agriculture college research station, University of Basrah, in the 2021 season.

The main objective of this research was to investigate the effect of comparing five combinations of combined tillage machines on maize yield in order to evaluate crop yield, and fuel consumption and compare them to five conventional tillage systems.

The combined tillage machines are The T1 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm, a chisel plow, a disk harrow, and a roller.

T2 is similar to TI, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm.

A T3 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm and a chisel plow.

T4 is similar to T3, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm.

A T5 combined tillage machine consists of a chisel plow and a disk harrow.

The conventional tillage systems include M1, which consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller), M2 consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller), M3 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow ), M4 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow), MS consists of two passes (chisel plow + disk harrow).

Each treatment was replicated three times, and the data was analyzed using a randomized complete block design in this experiment.

The mean of the treatments for the combined tillage machines and conventional tillage systems were compared using the t-test at the probability level (0.01).

The results of the combined tillage machines T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 comparison with conventional tillage systems M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 revealed that the maize yield increased by 56.10 and 59.42, 56.48, 35.29, and 35.31% and saved fuel by 54.86 and 60.42, 36.77, 39.77, and 42.20% and decreased the total cost by 24.62, 24.70, 28.70, 27.61, and 16.50%.

However, BCR was raised by 96.62, 101.28, 92.44, 68.35.20, and 57.24%, respectively.

Soil tillage by combined tillage machines was found to have positive effects on yield and fuel consumption of the maize yield.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Nasir, Aqil J.& Ndawi, Dakhil Radi& Muhsin, Sadiq Jabbar. 2022. Yield and economic analysis of maize production using various combined tillage machines and comparison to the conventional tillage systems. Journal of Thi-Qar University for Agricultural Researches،Vol. 11, no. 2, pp.269-284.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1513620

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Nasir, Aqil J.…[et al.]. Yield and economic analysis of maize production using various combined tillage machines and comparison to the conventional tillage systems. Journal of Thi-Qar University for Agricultural Researches Vol. 11, no. 2 (2022), pp.269-284.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1513620

American Medical Association (AMA)

Nasir, Aqil J.& Ndawi, Dakhil Radi& Muhsin, Sadiq Jabbar. Yield and economic analysis of maize production using various combined tillage machines and comparison to the conventional tillage systems. Journal of Thi-Qar University for Agricultural Researches. 2022. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp.269-284.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1513620

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 282-284

Record ID

BIM-1513620