الاستدلال الحجاجي في الخطاب القرآني : "الآية 23 من سورة البقرة" نموذجا

Abstract EN

This article is part of the linguistics study, which tends to set up a natural logic where can exist the essential tools, in order to highlight the existing inferences are available in the natural language.

if the evidence.

logic is to control and codify the Shamn inferences, the natural logic benefits from the logical evidence and it quotes some of its techniques to establish rules that can found the dynamics of natural connotations, and evaluate its effectiveness.

the study aims, first, to distinguish between natural inferences and conceptual inferences.

the practical side will then focus on the inventory of the evidentiary means that are allocated to the construction of Qur’an pilgrims capable of provoking minds and making them convinced.

the study tends to test the effectiveness of some of the mandatory rules suggested by means of the logic of language.

and to prove how these rules are effective in understanding natural inference with their manifold paths.

this study is based on two basic to the hypotheses.

the first relates curriculum; we predict that combining linguistic and logical study.

provides the learner with the appropriate keys to adjust the volumetric inferences of natural letters.

the second hypothesis : they are related to the corpus; in this respect, we believe that the qur'anic discourse is unique in building a special argument that takes into account the varying degrees, nature and contrasting.

this qur'anic characteristic makes "one verse" sufficient, suppose, by drawing out the most important natural-logic origins.

based on what he attributed.

the problem of the study can be procedural in its nature, the most important of which is sub-questions; it is how we can identify and classify the evidentiary mechanisms that interfere in the construction of the qur'anic pilgrims? to what extent will the mandatory rules, suggested by natural logic, enable us to explain and represent Qur'anic inferences?.