الرقابة القضائية على أعمال الحرب

Abstract EN

The Authors and judiciary in France, Egypt and Iraq tends to Exclusion to declare war from judicial scrutiny because it related to external relations of the state, as well as the involvement of more than one authority in doing so.

The modern judiciary in France made war measures from Acts of sover eighty Provided that acts directly related to fighting.

in United States of America, Acts of Battle limited that need to a legisla tive mandate are Subject to the control of the judiciary, while non-restricted Battle acts are not subject to judicial control because it held political Adjec tive.

In Egypt, The acts directly related to fighting are not subject to control ju dicial and it was decide scope outside the territory of the state and toward the face of the enemy, the state Council also gave the Adjective of sovereignty on military measures, which are taken by the enemy authority.

In Iraq, The Court of Cassation considered all matters relating to hostilities are of sovereignty decisions.ction .