الاستفهام المغلق في القرآن الكريم: (مقاربة حجاجية)‎

Abstract EN

This study adopted a descriptive analytical method to investigate the closed interrogation in the holy Quran and to display its argumentative intended answer that is always limited to affirmation or denial consequently, which strengthens the argument of the holy Quran discourse.

The closed interrogation with its interrogative intention, includes a clear argument form that allows the recipients to participate in the expected answer.

In addition to that it includes conversational style in its nature which is considered a fundamental style of the modern argumentative theory that is based on enabling dialogue and discussion.

However, the closed interrogation reduces the answering options of the recipient, such a style has the effect of controlling the discourse.

The research aims to reveal the importance of closed interrogation in the Holy Quran and its argumentative role.

It also attempts to show the strength of the closed interrogation and the property of its questions such as (do / does and Hamza) and methods of questioning, such as approval, negation, denial and imperative.

This has been investigated by the analysis of the verses of the holy Quran, consequently, the research reveals part of the miracle of the Quran discourse, and its ability to persuade through the linguistic structure and the power of its influence and persuasion.

The results also show that the closed interrogation is an important argumentative phenomenon in the Holy Quran used to convince recipients.