خطاب الجائحة شاهدا حجاجيا

Abstract EN

: This research looks at the coronavirus pandemic that has plagued the world as a discourse or set of confrontational discourses; Each discourse seeks to convince its addressees of its own point of view; Official discourse tends to convince the credibility of a serious epidemic that threatens humanity in its existence, as well as Stat this research looks at the coronavirus pandemic that has plagued the world as es' health, economic and social, while popular discourse tends to overturn its thesis and question its alleged credibility to the point of denying the existence of the epidemic.

The two conflicting discourses used a number of rhetorical arguments that the research sought to demonstrate, identify and illustrate from rhetoric that had spread in social and media.

One of the main objectives of this research was to call for linking rhetoric to live daily speeches, rather than limiting them to rigid examples that are not related to their communication contexts.

The other of its objectives was to show that the battle of the coronavirus was a rhetorical battle that used the rhetorical sufficiency of the argument as it was a health, economic and social battle.

Accordingly, research has been able to demonstrate that rhetoric is not so much a set of figures of discourse as a tool for decision-making and self-defense in a ruthless world.