جدلية الفهم والتأويل

Abstract EN

This their cognitive study to the detection about the production around close the interpretation and openness of the brain towards inquiries seeks limited and that through the scientific executors the investigator; the effort raved who the searching through the use of methods straightens on the different cognitive contexts reconciled constructive intention my manner of readers towards speech occupies his the chronological human in distances and as that speech to productive energy happens his rotary become remote its thoughts and theories and her other realizes.

no doubting in that the speech introduced many forms in the lingual speech, leans to it texts owners.

in order to have an impact on the addressing, so the speech in met from the logical spouses ships to order results carries in him numerous masts the recipient so understanding of the text and his baptizes to interpretation of evidence weakness across the critics and the philosophers about composes them and the interpretation in visualizations is different corroded the recipient be about to does not divide between them.

so what are the borders of the interpretation opposite the textual phenomena? is it explain to understand? or understand to explain?