دور العقل في إدراك الحكم الشرعي قبل ورود الشرع

Abstract EN

Moslem scholars agreed that Allah is the ruler and no rules except His Ones.

The disagreement among scholars is in the recognition of the rule before sending messengers and the question is for rule receivers: Is it possible for mind to recognize it without messengers, a holy book or a text either connotationally or denotationally.

This depends on the base “mind’s improvement and uglification”.

The party who claimed Islamic law improvement and uglification like Ashae’ra was adopting limited vision on Islamic law rules.

Others who adopted mind’s improvement and uglification had another vision on Islamic rules.

Ancestors, Matereedia, Mu’tazela and Shia’a agreed upon feature stability in actions recognized by mind.

Narrated text matches with mind and does not prevent a thing unless mind does through uglification feature and agrees with something else for improvement feature.

Ancestors and Matoredia agreed that reward, punishment and Islamic rule are not a consequence of mind's recognition for good and bad actions.

These actions are recognized by Ruler's permission as there is no order or prevention without Ruler's text.

Ashae'ra agreed on the previous point but disagreed on good and bad Islamic law improvement and uglification.

Mu'tazela and Shia'a disagreed on this point and said with the consequence of Islamic rules on mind's reward and punishment