البصمة الوراثية وأثرها على نسب المولود: دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

There have been many jurisprudence, legislative and judicial disputes about the extent of reliance on the genetic fingerprint as evidence in proving or denying descent, where experiments have shown that their results have reached a degree of certainty of about 99%, and they indicate the identity of each particular individual, and have many areas of benefit from them in proving descent: as in the case of mixing between newborns in hospitals, and in the case of suspicion of IVF children or what is known as IVF, Some of the contemporary jurisprudence believe that reliance on the genetic fingerprint is not to rely on the DNA except what the presumption of the Qayafa accepts, while the other expands in adopting it as an independent evidence that avoids cursing and is sufficient in determining the pedigree in proof and denial, and since the subject of DNA is one of the most accurate and important topics related to descent, which appeared recently in our time, we had to employ the areas of use of the genetic fingerprint and benefit from it and the statement of jurisprudential and legal opinions and jurisprudence of the judiciary, on the proof and negation of descent, especially in the change of traditional social construction and the development of scientific techniques in accordance with general Sharia and legal rules.