Is co2 laser hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional open hemorrhoidectomy?

Joint Authors

Kamal, Zuhayr Bashir
Sultan, Sad H.
al-Troushi, Muhammad A.
al-Fayyd, Raysan F.
Husayn, Wisam Auday

Source

al-Kindy College Medical Journal

Issue

Vol. 6, Issue 1 (30 Jun. 2010), pp.4-10, 7 p.

Publisher

University of Baghdad al-Kindi College of Medicine

Publication Date

2010-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Medicine

Topics

Abstract EN

Background : Hemorrhoids are one of the most common surgical conditions.

Conventional haemorrhoidectomy was the traditional operation for the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Other modalities of treatment had been used as an alternative operations including C02 laser haemorrhoidectomy.

Objectives : To determine the outcome of treatment of hemorrhoids by using CO2 laser haemorrhoidectomy and its advantages over conventional surgery Methods : This is a retrospective comparative interventional study of 1024 case of third degree shaemorhoids selected out of 1300 case of hemorrhoids of different degrees, admitted to Al-Kindy, Al-Yarmook teaching hospitals and Abd Al-Majeed private hospital, from May 1998 to July 2002, they were treated by CO2 laser haemorrhoidectomy and conventional surgery.

They are divided into 2 groups randomly, 512 cases treated by CO2 laser (group A), 512 cases treated by conventional surgery (group B).

Both groups were studied regarding operative time, hospital stay, healing time, post operative complications and cost effectiveness.

Results : GROUP A, the operative time ranged from 10 to 20 minutes with an average of 13 minutes.

The hospital stay ranged from 4 to 12 hours with a mean time of 10 hours as all cases were treated as day cases.

Post operative pain was minimal in 50% of patients and required simple analgesia for treatment while 50% had no pain.

Bleeding occurred in less than 1% of cases, anal stenos is 3.3%, Infection recorded in 0.58% of patients.

GROUP B, The operative time ranged from 15 to 25 minutes with an average time of 19 minutes, hospital stay ranged from 24 to 48 hours with a mean time of 28 hours .Post operative pain recorded in all the patients (100%) and required narcotic analgesia for treatment, 25 patients (4.8%) had varying degrees of bleeding, 40 patients (7.8%) had infection, 25 patients (4.8%) had anal stenos is.

in group A due to shorter hospital stay, earlier healing of wounds, earlier return to work which was within 7 to 10 days, the surgical treatment proved to be cost effective.

Conclusion: CO2 laser Hemorrhoidectomy was found to be easy and safe procedure with lower rate of complications, shorter hospital stay and cost effective.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Sultan, Sad H.& Kamal, Zuhayr Bashir& al-Troushi, Muhammad A.& al-Fayyd, Raysan F.& Husayn, Wisam Auday. 2010. Is co2 laser hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional open hemorrhoidectomy?. al-Kindy College Medical Journal،Vol. 6, no. 1, pp.4-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-256783

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Sultan, Sad H.…[et al.]. Is co2 laser hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional open hemorrhoidectomy?. al-Kindy College Medical Journal Vol. 6, no. 1 (Jun. 2010), pp.4-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-256783

American Medical Association (AMA)

Sultan, Sad H.& Kamal, Zuhayr Bashir& al-Troushi, Muhammad A.& al-Fayyd, Raysan F.& Husayn, Wisam Auday. Is co2 laser hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional open hemorrhoidectomy?. al-Kindy College Medical Journal. 2010. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp.4-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-256783

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 9-10

Record ID

BIM-256783