Advanced carre planing preference among dialysis patients and factors influencing thier decisions

Abstract EN

To determine the resuscitation preferences of hemodialysis (HD) Saudi patients, we conducted a cross-sectional, observational descriptive questionnaire study in two major tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March to December 2007.

We enrolled all the patients on HD for two years or more, and excluded the patients who were transplant candidates, confused, or demented.

The questionnaire was composed of 4 sections.

The first 3 sections were concerned with demographic data, education levels, employment, family size, number of children, and functionality status besides knowledge about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission.

The fourth section contained different scenarios and questions on personal and preferences such as end of life decisions, medical interventions, CPR, ICU admission, and the decision maker in these events.

A total of 100 patients (53% males, 67% Saudis, and 85% married) were enrolled in the study.

The mean duration on dialysis was 6.0 years (± 4.1).

More than 70% of the patients viewed themselves as above average in the religiosity score, and 44% disclosed a good life quality.

More than 95% had little or no knowledge about cardiac resuscitation, intubation, and mechanical ventilation.

The majority of the patients authorized their treating physician to decide for them about cardiac resuscitation in case they did not make advanced directives and only 22% believed that this decision should be made by their family members.

If their physician believed their condition was hopeless, 77% preferred to stay at home.

We conclude that the majority of our patients had limited awareness about cardiac resuscitation measures.

The majority of the patients trust their physicians to decide about the futility of resuscitation.

Patients were able to decide reasonably well when they are well informed.