Political discourse analysis between ambiguities and clarity
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 2004, Issue 3 (31 May. 2004), pp.93-97, 5 p.
Publisher
University Kasdi Merbah Ouargla Faculty of Arts and Languages
Publication Date
2004-05-31
Country of Publication
Algeria
No. of Pages
5
Main Subjects
Languages & Comparative Literature
Topics
Abstract EN
This paper intends, first, to expose the two ambiguities related to both the term ‘political discourse’ and the notion ‘political discourse analysis.’ The two ambiguities are clearly explained.
Later, the concern of the paper will be with the two confusions existing in both Shapiro’s (1981) and Graber’s (1981) definitions of political discourse.
At the end, the very appropriate definition of political discourse is provided.
Actually, defining political discourse on the basis of contextual features blocks the rise of ambiguities and confusions.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Miridji, Salim Fathi. 2004. Political discourse analysis between ambiguities and clarity. al-Athar،Vol. 2004, no. 3, pp.93-97.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-393810
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Miridji, Salim Fathi. Political discourse analysis between ambiguities and clarity. al-Athar No. 3 (May. 2004), pp.93-97.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-393810
American Medical Association (AMA)
Miridji, Salim Fathi. Political discourse analysis between ambiguities and clarity. al-Athar. 2004. Vol. 2004, no. 3, pp.93-97.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-393810
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references : p. 97
Record ID
BIM-393810