MRI versus ultrasound in localization of undescended testicles

Joint Authors

Shihatah, Adil A.
Zakariyya, Usamah M.

Source

Suez Canal University Medical Journal

Issue

Vol. 6, Issue 2 (31 Oct. 2003), pp.291-300, 10 p.

Publisher

Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine

Publication Date

2003-10-31

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Medicine

Topics

Abstract EN

Introduction : Undescended testis is a major clinical problem in male infants as long-term retention of undescended testis is associated with dramatically increased risk of testicular neoplasm, especially seminoma.

In addition, undescended testis will alter the male fertility.

Aim of the work : To compare the results of the two imaging modalities (US & MRI) in localization of undescended testicles to chose the line of treatment.

Patients and Methods : Our current study included 30 male patients with age range between 3 months up to 25 years.

Clinically, the undescended testicle was RT.

Sided in 12 patients (40 %), LT.

sided in 10 patients (33.3 %) and bilateral in 8 patients (26.7 %).

All the 30 patients were examined firstly with ultrasound followed by MRI.

The findings were recorded and compared based on surgical findings.

Results : US succeeded in localizing the undescended testis in 25 cases (25 / 30 = 83.3 %) and did not detect 5 cases (5 / 30 = 16.7 %).

12 cases were atrophied on US (12 / 30 = 40 %).

Sensitivity was.

(89.3.6 %), specificity (100 %) and accuracy (90 %).

The US locations of the 25 cases were 14 cases within inguinal canal, 7 cases adjacent to the superficial inguinal ring & 4 cases adjacent to the internal inguinal ring.

MRI succeeded in localizing the undescended testis in 28 cases (28 / 30 = 93.3 %) and did not detect 2 cases (6.7 %), anorchia (testicular agenesis).

16 cases were atrophied on MRI (53.3 %).

Sensitivity was (100 %), specificity (100 %) and accuracy (100 %).The MRI location of the detected cases were 15 cases within inguinal canal (15 / 30 = 50 %), 8 cases adjacent to superficial inguinal ring (8 / 30 = 26.7 %) & 4 cases adjacent to internal inguinal ring (4 / 30 = 13.3 %) and one case was ectopic intra-abdominal.

On surgery 28 undescended testicles were detected (consuistent with MRI findings).

2 cases were truly absent (agenesis) on exploration.

Conclusion : MRI is a new modality for localization of undescended testicles because; it is safe, multiplanar & high resolution.

MRI with IV contrast injection is helpful especially in suspected cases with atrophy.

Ultrasound must be used first, as both modalities are complementary to each other.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Shihatah, Adil A.& Zakariyya, Usamah M.. 2003. MRI versus ultrasound in localization of undescended testicles. Suez Canal University Medical Journal،Vol. 6, no. 2, pp.291-300.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-394350

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Shihatah, Adil A.& Zakariyya, Usamah M.. MRI versus ultrasound in localization of undescended testicles. Suez Canal University Medical Journal Vol. 6, no. 2 (Oct. 2003), pp.291-300.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-394350

American Medical Association (AMA)

Shihatah, Adil A.& Zakariyya, Usamah M.. MRI versus ultrasound in localization of undescended testicles. Suez Canal University Medical Journal. 2003. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp.291-300.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-394350

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 299-300

Record ID

BIM-394350