The effect of semantic mapping and group discussion on Jordanian secondary stage students reading comprehension and verbal communication in English

Other Title(s)

أثر الخرائط الدلالية و النقاش الجماعي في الاستيعاب القرائي و التواصل اللفظي باللغة الإنجليزية لدى الطلبة الاردنيين في المرحلة الثانوية

Dissertant

al-Raqab, Khalid Ibrahim Muhammad

Thesis advisor

al-Kumi, Abd al-Salam Abd al-Khaliq

Comitee Members

Shair, Awatif Ali
al-Duwayk, Badr Said
al-Khawlidah, Ahmad Hamad

University

Amman Arab University

Faculty

Faculty of Educational Sciences and psychological

Department

Department of Curriculum and Instruction

University Country

Jordan

Degree

Ph.D.

Degree Date

2009

English Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the effect of semantic mapping and group discussion on Jordanian secondary stage students` reading comprehension and verbal communication in English.

This study aimed at testing the following hypotheses: 1.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` achievement in reading comprehension between the semantic mapping group and group discussion group.

2.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` achievement in reading comprehension between the semantic mapping group and a combination of semantic mapping and group discussion group.

3.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` achievement reading comprehension between the group discussion group and a combination of semantic mapping and group discussion group.

4.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` verbal communication between the semantic mapping group and group discussion group.

5.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` verbal communication between the semantic mapping group and the combination of semantic mapping and group discussion group.

6.

There is no statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the Jordanian secondary stage students` verbal communication between the group discussion group and the combination of semantic mapping and group discussion group.

The subjects of the study consisted of 78 eleventh grade students in Al Muqablain secondary school at Amman Third Directorate of Education in Jordan.

These students were purposefully selected and randomly assigned to three experimental groups.

To examine the hypotheses of the study, the researcher developed three reading programs based on three learning strategies.

The strategies were semantic mapping, group discussion, and the combination of semantic mapping and group discussion.

Each program consisted of nine lesson plans.

He also developed a test to measure students` achievement in reading comprehension and an observation checklist to measure the students’ verbal communication.

The period of the experiment lasted for one semester (approximately three months).

Students’ scores on the reading comprehension achievement test and their verbal communication were analyzed using the means, standard deviations and one- way ANCOVA.

The findings of the pretest revealed that there were no significant differences in reading comprehension achievement or verbal communication among the three experimental groups.

The posttest showed that there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in reading comprehension achievement and verbal communication (α=0.05) in favor of the group that used the combination of semantic mapping and group discussion.

In light of these findings, the researcher recommended that EFL teachers should use the combination of semantic mapping and group discussion in teaching reading and verbal communication.

Main Subjects

Educational Sciences
Languages & Comparative Literature

Topics

No. of Pages

205

Table of Contents

Table of contents.

Abstract.

Abstract in Arabic.

Chapter One : Introduction.

Chapter Two : Review of related literature.

Chapter Three : Method and procedures.

Chapter Four : Findings of the study.

Chapter Five : Discussion, conclusions and recommendations.

References.

American Psychological Association (APA)

al-Raqab, Khalid Ibrahim Muhammad. (2009). The effect of semantic mapping and group discussion on Jordanian secondary stage students reading comprehension and verbal communication in English. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Amman Arab University, Jordan
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-434045

Modern Language Association (MLA)

al-Raqab, Khalid Ibrahim Muhammad. The effect of semantic mapping and group discussion on Jordanian secondary stage students reading comprehension and verbal communication in English. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Amman Arab University. (2009).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-434045

American Medical Association (AMA)

al-Raqab, Khalid Ibrahim Muhammad. (2009). The effect of semantic mapping and group discussion on Jordanian secondary stage students reading comprehension and verbal communication in English. (Doctoral dissertations Theses and Dissertations Master). Amman Arab University, Jordan
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-434045

Language

English

Data Type

Arab Theses

Record ID

BIM-434045