Retrograde versus Prograde Models of Accreting Black Holes

Author

Garofalo, David

Source

Advances in Astronomy

Issue

Vol. 2013, Issue 2013 (31 Dec. 2013), pp.1-11, 11 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2013-04-16

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

11

Main Subjects

Astronomy

Abstract EN

There is a general consensus that magnetic fields, accretion disks, and rotating black holes are instrumental in the generation of the most powerful sources of energy in the known universe.

Nonetheless, because magnetized accretion onto rotating black holes involves both the complications of nonlinear magnetohydrodynamics that currently cannot fully be treated numerically, and uncertainties about the origin of magnetic fields that at present are part of the input, the space of possible solutions remains less constrained.

Consequently, the literature still bears witness to the proliferation of rather different black hole engine models.

But the accumulated wealth of observational data is now sufficient to meaningfully distinguish between them.

It is in this light that this critical paper compares the recent retrograde framework with standard “spin paradigm” prograde models.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Garofalo, David. 2013. Retrograde versus Prograde Models of Accreting Black Holes. Advances in Astronomy،Vol. 2013, no. 2013, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-454983

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Garofalo, David. Retrograde versus Prograde Models of Accreting Black Holes. Advances in Astronomy No. 2013 (2013), pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-454983

American Medical Association (AMA)

Garofalo, David. Retrograde versus Prograde Models of Accreting Black Holes. Advances in Astronomy. 2013. Vol. 2013, no. 2013, pp.1-11.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-454983

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-454983