Why Did Americans Reject Compulsory Health Insurance after WWI? An Application of the Lifecycle Model

Joint Authors

Wilson, Stuart J.
Emery, J. C. Herbert

Source

Economics Research International

Issue

Vol. 2012, Issue 2012 (31 Dec. 2012), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2012-01-19

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Economy

Abstract EN

Progressive reformers failed to gain support to implement compulsory health insurance in the US after WWI.

Modeling results presented in this paper, using a lifecycle model with sickness risk and precautionary savings, support the conclusion that existing voluntary insurance plans were adequate and welfare-enhancing in the US, that compulsory health insurance as proposed would not be welfare-enhancing, and that Americans' preference to self-insure during most of their working lives was rational, utility-maximizing behaviour.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Wilson, Stuart J.& Emery, J. C. Herbert. 2012. Why Did Americans Reject Compulsory Health Insurance after WWI? An Application of the Lifecycle Model. Economics Research International،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-455789

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Wilson, Stuart J.& Emery, J. C. Herbert. Why Did Americans Reject Compulsory Health Insurance after WWI? An Application of the Lifecycle Model. Economics Research International No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-455789

American Medical Association (AMA)

Wilson, Stuart J.& Emery, J. C. Herbert. Why Did Americans Reject Compulsory Health Insurance after WWI? An Application of the Lifecycle Model. Economics Research International. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-455789

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-455789