The Effect of an Educating versus Normalizing Approach on Treatment Motivation in Patients Presenting with Delusions : An Experimental Investigation with Analogue Patients

Abstract EN

Until recently a widespread recommendation for clinicians was not to respond to the content of patients' delusions but to stress at an early time point that the patient has a mental illness (educating approach).

An opposed recommendation is to validate the patients’ symptoms and normalize them (normalizing approach).

This study used an experimental design to compare the impact of these two approaches on treatment motivation (TM).

A cover story about a person who develops persecutory delusions was used to guide a sample of 81 healthy participants who served as analogue patients into imagining experiencing delusions.

This was followed by a random assignment to either an educating or a normalizing consultation with a fictive clinician.

Consultations only differed in content.

Finally, we assessed the participants' motivation to accept medication (Medication TM), psychological treatment (Psychological TM), and treatment offered by this particular clinician independent of the kind of treatment (Clinician-related TM).

Participants in the normalizing condition showed higher Clinician-related and Psychological TM than those in the educating condition.

Medication TM was unaffected by condition.

Following our results using a normalizing approach seems to be advisable in a first-contact situation with patients with delusions and favourable to a simple educating approach.