![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy : Is It Worth Still Performing the Retroperitoneal Route?
Joint Authors
Abbou, Clément-Claude
Salomon, Laurent
Ouzaid, Idir
Pignot, Géraldine
Xylinas, Evanguelos
de la Taille, Alexandre
Hoznek, Andras
Tardieu, Arnaud
Source
Issue
Vol. 2012, Issue 2012 (31 Dec. 2012), pp.1-5, 5 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2012-06-12
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
5
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Objective.
The objective of this study was to compare perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of TLPN (transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) versus RLPN (retroperitoneal).
Patients and Methods.
From 1997 to 2009, a retrospective study of 153 consecutive patients who underwent TLPN or RLPN for suspicious renal masses was performed.
Complications, functional and oncological outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.
Results.
With a mean followup of 39 and 32 months, respectively, 66 and 87 patients had TLPN and RLPN, respectively.
Tumor location was more often posterior in the RLPN and more often anterior in the TLPN.
Mean operative time and mean hospital stay were longer in the TLPN group with 190±85 min versus 154±47 (P=0.001) and 9.2±6.4 days versus 6.2±4.5 days (P<0.05), respectively.
Transfusion and urinary fistulas rates were similar in the 2 groups.
After 3-year followup, chronic kidney failure occurred in 6 and and 4% (P=0.67) in after TLPN and RLPN, respectively.
After 3-year followup, recurrence free survival was 96.7% and 96.6% (P=0.91) in the TLPN and RLPN groups, respectively.
Conclusion.
Our study confirmed that TLPN had longer operative time and hospital stay than RLPN.
The complication rates were similar.
Furthermore, mid-term oncological and functional outcomes were similar.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Ouzaid, Idir& Xylinas, Evanguelos& Pignot, Géraldine& Tardieu, Arnaud& Hoznek, Andras& Abbou, Clément-Claude…[et al.]. 2012. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy : Is It Worth Still Performing the Retroperitoneal Route?. Advances in Urology،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474326
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Ouzaid, Idir…[et al.]. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy : Is It Worth Still Performing the Retroperitoneal Route?. Advances in Urology No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474326
American Medical Association (AMA)
Ouzaid, Idir& Xylinas, Evanguelos& Pignot, Géraldine& Tardieu, Arnaud& Hoznek, Andras& Abbou, Clément-Claude…[et al.]. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy : Is It Worth Still Performing the Retroperitoneal Route?. Advances in Urology. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474326
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-474326