Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques
Joint Authors
Lee, Allison J.
Ranasinghe, J. Sudharma
Cohn, Jennifer Hochman
Source
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Issue
Vol. 2011, Issue 2011 (31 Dec. 2011), pp.1-17, 17 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2011-07-06
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
17
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Cardiac output (CO) measurement has long been considered essential to the assessment and guidance of therapeutic decisions in critically ill patients and for patients undergoing certain high-risk surgeries.
Despite controversies, complications and inherent errors in measurement, pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continuous and intermittent bolus techniques of CO measurement continue to be the gold standard.
Newer techniques provide less invasive alternatives; however, currently available monitors are unable to provide central circulation pressures or true mixed venous saturations.
Esophageal Doppler and pulse contour monitors can predict fluid responsiveness and have been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity.
Many minimally invasive techniques continue to suffer from decreased accuracy and reliability under periods of hemodynamic instability, and so few have reached the level of interchangeability with the PAC.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Lee, Allison J.& Cohn, Jennifer Hochman& Ranasinghe, J. Sudharma. 2011. Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques. Anesthesiology Research and Practice،Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474495
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Lee, Allison J.…[et al.]. Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques. Anesthesiology Research and Practice No. 2011 (2011), pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474495
American Medical Association (AMA)
Lee, Allison J.& Cohn, Jennifer Hochman& Ranasinghe, J. Sudharma. Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2011. Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-17.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-474495
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-474495