Use of Averaged Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire Scores

Abstract EN

Background.

Averaged Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire (NSSQ) support scores remove the influence of network size variability but may unduly lower scores for participants with large networks.

Objectives.

To evaluate the use of averaged NSSQ scores.

Method.

Pearson correlations determined if averaged scores decreased as network size increased across three samples.

Then, Pearson correlations between a criterion variable and both averaged and raw support scores were computed along with the resultant power to detect a true effect.

Results.

Neither averaged total functional support nor averaged affect and affirmation scores decreased as sample size increased.

However, averaged aid scores did decrease as network size increased.

Power also increased markedly in all averaged versus raw scores except in averaged aid scores.

Discussion and Conclusions.

Use of averaged aid scores is not recommended.

Use of all other averaged scores appears acceptable.