Two Different Protocols for Knee Joint Motion Analyses in the Stance Phase of Gait : Correlation of the Rigid Marker Set and the Point Cluster Technique

Abstract EN

Objective.

There are no reports comparing the protocols provided by rigid marker set (RMS) and point cluster technique (PCT), which are similar in terms of estimating anatomical landmarks based on markers attached to a segment.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the correlation of the two different protocols, which are protocols for knee motion in gait, and identify whether measurement errors arose at particular periods during the stance phase.

Methods.

The study subjects were 10 healthy adults.

All estimated anatomical landmarks were which their positions, calculated by each protocol of the PCT and RMS, were compared using Pearson’s product correlation coefficients.

To examine the reliability of the angle changes of the knee joint measured by RMS and the PCT, the coefficient of multiple correlations (CMCs) was used.

Results.

Although the estimates of the anatomical landmarks showed high correlations of >0.90 (P<0.01) for the Y- and Z-coordinates, the correlations were low for the X-coordinates at all anatomical landmarks.

The CMC was 0.94 for flexion/extension, 0.74 for abduction/adduction, and 0.71 for external/internal rotation.

Conclusion.

Flexion/extension and abduction/adduction of the knee by two different protocols had comparatively little error and good reliability after 30% of the stance phase.