Women’s Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy

Abstract EN

Objectives.

Pregnant women, referred because of an increased risk of fetal Down syndrome, who underwent an invasive prenatal procedure were offered a choice between karyotyping and rapid targeted testing.

This study aims to assess women’s attitudes and experiences towards what option to choose.

Methods.

A retrospective multicentre survey (2008–2010) was conducted among 1370 women.

General questions were asked about decision making issues, followed by personal questions about their experiences in choice making, test preference, influence of others, and possible regrets.

Results.

In total, 90.1% of the respondents (N=825) indicated that pregnant women are able to choose, although 33.1% stated that the choice can best be made by a professional.

18.4% indicated that making a choice places a burden on women.

In 96.4%, respondents preferred to have the option to choose again in case of a next pregnancy, whereas 2.7% preferred the choice to be made by a professional.

Regret was indicated by 1.2%.

Decision making was influenced by others in 64.9%.

A slightly higher preference for karyotyping was indicated by 52.7% of the respondents.

Conclusions.

Positive attitudes and experiences were expressed towards the option to choose.

Respondents took decisions freely, although sometimes influenced by a partner or a professional, to follow their individual perspectives.