Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Indirect Small-Field CCD Technique Using a High-Contrast Phantom

Joint Authors

Lackner, Klaus
Stützer, Hartmut
Bovenschulte, Henning
Sendler, Volker
Frommolt, Peter
Boecker, Julia
Krug, Kathrin Barbara

Source

International Journal of Breast Cancer

Issue

Vol. 2011, Issue 2011 (31 Dec. 2011), pp.1-9, 9 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2010-10-17

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Diseases
Medicine

Abstract EN

Objective.

To compare the detection of microcalcifications on mammograms of an anthropomorphic breast phantom acquired by a direct digital flat-panel detector mammography system (FPM) versus a stereotactic breast biopsy system utilizing CCD (charge-coupled device) technology with either a 1024 or 512 acquisition matrix (1024 CCD and 512 CCD).

Materials and Methods.

Randomly distributed silica beads (diameter 100–1400 μm) and anthropomorphic scatter bodies were applied to 48 transparent films.

The test specimens were radiographed on a direct digital FPM and by the indirect 1024 CCD and 512 CCD techniques.

Four radiologists rated the monitor-displayed images independently of each other in random order.

Results.

The rate of correct positive readings for the “number of detectable microcalcifications” for silica beads of 100–199 μm in diameter was 54.2%, 50.0% and 45.8% by FPM, 1024 CCD and 512 CCD, respectively.

The inter-rater variability was most pronounced for silica beads of 100–199 μm in diameter.

The greatest agreement with the gold standard was observed for beads >400 μm in diameter across all methods.

Conclusion.

Stereotactic spot images taken by 1024 matrix CCD technique are diagnostically equivalent to direct digital flat-panel mammograms for visualizing simulated microcalcifications >400 μm in diameter.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Krug, Kathrin Barbara& Stützer, Hartmut& Frommolt, Peter& Boecker, Julia& Bovenschulte, Henning& Sendler, Volker…[et al.]. 2010. Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Indirect Small-Field CCD Technique Using a High-Contrast Phantom. International Journal of Breast Cancer،Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-491594

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Krug, Kathrin Barbara…[et al.]. Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Indirect Small-Field CCD Technique Using a High-Contrast Phantom. International Journal of Breast Cancer No. 2011 (2011), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-491594

American Medical Association (AMA)

Krug, Kathrin Barbara& Stützer, Hartmut& Frommolt, Peter& Boecker, Julia& Bovenschulte, Henning& Sendler, Volker…[et al.]. Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Indirect Small-Field CCD Technique Using a High-Contrast Phantom. International Journal of Breast Cancer. 2010. Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-491594

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-491594