The Biological Effects of Combining Metals in a Posterior Spinal Implant : In Vivo Model Development Report of the First Two Cases

Joint Authors

Farnsworth, Christine L.
Breisch, Eric
Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
Rohmiller, Michael T.
Newton, Peter O.
Kim, Jung Ryul

Source

Advances in Orthopedic Surgery

Issue

Vol. 2014, Issue 2014 (31 Dec. 2014), pp.1-9, 9 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2014-02-26

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Study Design.

Combinations of metal implants (stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti), and cobalt chrome (CC)) were placed in porcine spines.

After 12 months, tissue response and implant corrosion were compared between mixed and single metal junctions.

Objective.

Model development and an attempt to determine any detriment of combining different metals in posterior spinal instrumentation.

Methods.

Yucatan mini-pigs underwent instrumentation over five unfused lumbar levels.

A SS rod and a Ti rod were secured with Ti and SS pedicle screws, SS and Ti crosslinks, SS and CC sublaminar wires, and Ti sublaminar cable.

The resulting 4 SS/SS, 3 Ti/Ti, and 11 connections between dissimilar metals per animal were studied after 12 months using radiographs, gross observation, and histology (foreign body reaction (FBR), metal particle count, and inflammation analyzed).

Results.

Two animals had constructs in place for 12 months with no complications.

Histology of tissue over SS/SS connections demonstrated 11.1 ± 7.6 FBR cells, 2.1 ± 1.7 metal particles, and moderate to extensive inflammation.

Ti/Ti tissue showed 6.3 ± 3.8 FBR cells, 5.2 ± 6.7 particles, and no to extensive inflammation (83% extensive).

Tissue over mixed components had 14.1 ± 12.6 FBR cells and 13.4 ± 27.8 particles.

Samples surrounding wires/cables versus other combinations demonstrated FBR (12.4 ± 13.5 versus 12.0 ± 9.6 cells, P = 0.96), particles (19.8 ± 32.6 versus 4.3 ± 12.7, P = 0.24), and inflammation (50% versus 75% extensive, P = 0.12).

Conclusions.

A nonfusion model was developed to study corrosion and analyze biological responses.

Although no statistical differences were found in overlying tissue response to single versus mixed metal combinations, galvanic corrosion between differing metals is not ruled out.

This pilot study supports further investigation to answer concerns when mixing metals in spinal constructs.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Farnsworth, Christine L.& Newton, Peter O.& Breisch, Eric& Rohmiller, Michael T.& Kim, Jung Ryul& Akbarnia, Behrooz A.. 2014. The Biological Effects of Combining Metals in a Posterior Spinal Implant : In Vivo Model Development Report of the First Two Cases. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery،Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-496752

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Farnsworth, Christine L.…[et al.]. The Biological Effects of Combining Metals in a Posterior Spinal Implant : In Vivo Model Development Report of the First Two Cases. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery No. 2014 (2014), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-496752

American Medical Association (AMA)

Farnsworth, Christine L.& Newton, Peter O.& Breisch, Eric& Rohmiller, Michael T.& Kim, Jung Ryul& Akbarnia, Behrooz A.. The Biological Effects of Combining Metals in a Posterior Spinal Implant : In Vivo Model Development Report of the First Two Cases. Advances in Orthopedic Surgery. 2014. Vol. 2014, no. 2014, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-496752

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-496752